Article

Introduction to Site Maps

by WebAIM

Site Maps or Indexes

As the term suggests a site map is a map of the web site and can be a list of links or a more complex representation. However, my advice is to keep the site map as simple as possible. There are three main types of site maps or indexes:

• Alphabetical
• Structural
• Graphical

Alphabetical Site Map

Alphabetical site indexes list all of the important areas of content on a site in alphabetical order, much like the index at the back of a book. This may be unnecessary for very small sites, and may be impractical for very large sites, because these lists can become too lengthy to use effectively, but it is also one of the most useful ways for a user to find information on a site.

Well-designed alphabetical site indexes include synonyms of words and concepts that users may want to search for. For example, in a site about classical composers, alphabetical site indexes should account for the fact that users may try to find out information about the composer Claude Debussy by looking under the first name, last name, or even terms such as "French composers," "impressionistic music," or even the names of his compositions such as Claire de Lune or Reverie.

The more comprehensive the alphabetical index, the more useful it is, as long as it does not become unwieldy. Developers may need to create multiple pages for long indexes, perhaps with a page for each letter of the alphabet.

Structural (Topical) Site Map

A structural site map is a list of links to the contents of a Web site, organized by topic. Normally, structural site maps mirror the site´s organization. For example, if a site has 3 main "tabs," or category links at the top of each page, these 3 categories could serve as the method for organizing the content of the structural site map.

Graphical Site Map

Although less common—and perhaps less useful—graphical site maps are one type of alternative to the more common text-based versions. These graphics often look similar to the organizational charts often used by businesses to delineate the hierarchical relationships between supervisors and the people whom they supervise.

One problem with graphical site maps for complex sites is that they would need large structural maps—perhaps larger than could be easily understood.

There are many ways of representing a site´s organization graphically. Photos or graphics could be used in the headings to group and illustrate concepts. Circles or boxes could be drawn around related pages. A furniture store could use a floor plan of a house to organize the names or photos of different types of furniture. All of the links to kitchen items could literally be placed in the diagram´s kitchen. Items for the family room could be listed in the diagram´s family room, and so on. This type of concept can be quite powerful when used carefully and when tested for usability. The creativity involved in thinking up ideas such as this can easily backfire though, creating a confusing mess. Be creative, but test solutions to ensure they work.

Graphical site maps are probably unnecessary if the visual design of the site navigation provides obvious visual cues as to the structure of the entire site. For example, if the site has 3 main tabs at the top, all of which are unambiguous in their purpose (or nearly so), a graphical version of a structural site map is probably unnecessary, though it would still be a judgment call on the part of the developer.

posted on Jun 12, 2007

   Topics